I don’t have any specific thing to talk about, but in keeping with my un-resolution for this year, I’m making myself write. This may wind up being a stream of consciousness link-post, so be warned.
I was in training a client last night and saw that my gym has a Prowler now. I’ve never used one before, but the mean-looking thing has come highly recommended by everyone I know that’s used it, so I’ll add it into my slowly-growing rotation of conditioning work.
Speaking of conditioning work, and going back to last week’s whining about being too beat up and (more importantly) unmotivated to train for big lifts anymore, I’ve been doing a fair bit of reading on the importance of hypertrophy and GPP/conditioning work as we get older.
Dan John — one of those guys that you’d be an idiot to ignore — wrote a great article called The 4 Pillars of Strength. The whole thing is a great read, whether you’ve seen it before or not, but what caught my attention was under number four:
Hypertrophy’s first phase should last until the gains begin to slow. Hopefully, this stage of the career will parallel the athlete’s attempts in team or Olympic sports. I’ve come to describe building muscle as “armor building” for the sport athlete. There’s a need for some mass, and the protection that mass delivers for the contact athlete…
At the next stage, the gentle downward slope after the initial year(s) of easy muscle gain, I always argue to put pure hypertrophy on the shelf and play around with some other things. Watching strongman contests on television will give you the insight that maybe doing farmer walks or pulling massively heavily objects for distance might help your body gain some mass.
On the other tack, it might also be a time to look at a dedicated leaning out phase. I’ve noted before that a serious fat loss attack seems to lead to greater muscle mass when you go back to “normal” eating and training. If you’re continuing an athletic career, there may be no better advice than to expand into strongman training and look at some fat loss. If the recent Track and Field Nationals taught me one thing, it’s this: Elite athletes ain’t fat.
What most people don’t realize is the next stage. As we age, the need for hypertrophy training increases compared to other training qualities. Yes, the master athlete might need to focus on maintaining or increasing muscle mass.
Let this be said: It’s assumed that the older athlete has the necessary techniques and a base in some kind of strength training. As we age into our middle years and beyond, the fight to hold muscle mass is probably the single best indicator of health.
As we prepare to enter Sunnybrook Senior Center, the bulk of our training probably shouldn’t be shuffleboard. Rather, we should be doing a program with roots in training for Mr. America. Body part training, split routines, machine training, high-rep work, isolated muscle training, and a rigid adherence to sets, reps, and rest periods is the appropriate protocol.
The hypertrophy curve is based in reality. All too often, we ignore that first dip and keep striving for more and more. Give yourself four or five years of armor building, then move into some other areas of strength training. For the athlete, certainly make sure you’re training for hypertrophy some of the time but never fully drop those higher rep workouts out of your training program. Certainly, leave room for the Olympic and power lifts, but don’t abandon the mass work.
That’s gold right there. Those of you who suffered through the original Maximum Muscle might have picked up on a similar theme from me: learn the basics first, develop a foundation of strength and technique (aka developing body awareness and learning how to move), then move on to more specific goals.
I like Dan’s thoughts on going through the initial growth spurt, then backing off to something else. The trend these days seems to be get as big as possible by overeating…and then keep on overeating to get even bigger. Guys: gains slow down. You get an initial burst of size that you might milk for six months, maybe a year if you really push it. But after that, it’s all diminishing returns. Overeating after that only gets you fatter — and unless you’re pinning up a gram a week, it’s not going to help you get stronger.
(Yeah, another rant about drug-bulking: just because your favorite strength athlete eats 10,000 calories a day with moon-face doesn’t mean you can pull it off. That’s right up there with muscle-mag fetishism.)
What I’m really liking here is his thoughts on overall development. You go from the initial learning, foundation-building stage, move to something else. Do strongman, compete in powerlifting, play a team sport, or get lean bodybuilder-style. There’s room for all of them; the point is, don’t grind away forever trying to bulk up when your time would be better spent on other things.
You might see what caught my eye, based on my earlier comments. Older athletes will benefit from hanging on to muscle mass — even if that means doing a straight-up Bro-split. This speaks to me; feeling like I’ve leveled off, I find the most enjoyable training I do now combines a little heavy stuff with a lot of hypertrophy-based volume work and conditioning work on the side.
Why does this happen? Well, there’s definitely changes in central hormonal action with age, the decline in GH and testosterone and such that everybody moans about. But we also see local changes in muscle tissue, with lesser autocrine/paracine (local growth factors) responses to exercise and diet both. Muscle becomes less responsive to exercise and to amino acids, and consequently the adaptive growth cycle is blunted.
There’s likely something to my ideas on needing a bigger whack, per workout, to get satellite cells dividing and fusing. There’s weirdness that happens when a muscle is trained to exhaustion, per bodybuilding orthodoxy, versus training it more strength style with lower reps and fewer reps. Most of the latter is neurologically focused, without taxing the muscular stuff quite as much. The difference between merely contracting a muscle (even hard contraction) and exhausting it is probably significant.
Myonuclei may or may not atrophy (it appears they don’t, at least not for years, hence “muscle memory”), but having more genetic material and protein-synthesizing equipment in a muscle is never a bad thing. For more mature muscle (mature in the sense of older folks, and in the sense of muscle that’s been built over years of training), traditional bodybuilder training ranging from HIT-style to Weider-pumping does good things. You’ve built the base, now the trick is refining it.
The biggest mistakes I made as a beginner were spending too much time trying to Get Big, and then spending too much time ignoring conditioning work. By conditioning I don’t mean running; I mean not doing anything that got my heart rate up. Complexes, circuits, sprints, sled pulling & dragging, hell even high-rep work…don’t ignore these things. We get drilled with this idea that any endurance work will destroy our strength and make us into Runners, but that’s just not true. What I find these days is that as my work capacity improves — from doing More Of Everything, including non-taxing strength sessions and more conditioning work — my lifting improves. The best lifts I’ve put up in the last few years have come during phases of very high activity, whether it was during my diet cycle of 2009 or my Bulgarian training phase a few months back. That can’t be an accident.
I think the biggest problem is focusing too much on One Particular Goal, year-round, with no focus on other things. If I could do it over again, I’d spend at least a little time keeping in work-capacity-building GPP training, and more bodybuilder-esque training at least part of the year. This is where the periodization wanking would come into the picture, so let me stop that right off the bat.
You need more planning than WODs “for time”. That’s too inconsistent. On the other hand, plotting out precise year-long macrocycles, detailed to the last workout, is too much. I like moving between high-volume phases and high-intensity phases, between phases that push conditioning and phases that push strength. That’s about as complex as my planning gets. Spend a month, six weeks, maybe two months pushing one — you stop when you hit a reasonable peak — then switch to the thing you weren’t doing. It’s really that simple.
My oddball fascination with autoregulatory training has moved me away from any strict workout structure. I have a plan, but I don’t know the details until they happen. I track numbers. Lots of numbers: I know what lifts I’m working with and how hard they were. I rest and shift gears when a particular approach stalls out. I try to take an easy week out of every three to four. If I had competitive goals, I don’t think I’d do this. Competitions need more structure. I think.
(Sometimes I have second thoughts about this, wondering what it’d be like to take a more lackadaisical approach to PL meet preparation, not sweating over it, just training hard all the time and then showing up to knock it out. My experiences with specific PL prep have been pretty awful, meaning I get hurt every single time, so I wonder what would have happened if I hadn’t gone through the Orthodox Peaking Cycles and just shown up to lift. Oh well.)
I did warn you that this was going to be stream of consciousness.